Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088811›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Small Language Models for Developing Agentic AI in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Critical Analysis.

Zain Khalpey, Nicholas King, Alyssa Abraham

RetractedAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zain KhalpeyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, HonorHealth, Scottsdale, USA.
Nicholas KingDepartment of Cardiology, HonorHealth, Scottsdale, USA.
Alyssa AbrahamKhalpey AI Lab, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, HonorHealth, Scottsdale, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are emerging as a transformative approach in healthcare, enabling autonomous task execution through integrated reasoning and tool use. While early implementations have largely relied on large language models (LLMs), growing evidence suggests that smaller language models may be better suited for many healthcare workflows due to their efficiency, scalability, and practicality in real-world clinical environments. This review examines the current landscape of small language models (SLMs) used in agentic healthcare applications, including clinical documentation, decision support, patient triage, and administrative automation. We synthesize available evidence on their performance, safety, and economic implications, and discuss key considerations for clinical deployment, including regulatory alignment and governance. Overall, small language models appear to offer sufficient capability for most agentic healthcare tasks while providing meaningful advantages in deployability, cost, and operational efficiency, supporting their role as a viable and often preferable alternative for clinical implementation.

Indexed as

agentic aiclinical decision supportcost-effectivenesshealthcare automationregulatory compliancesmall language models

Identifiers

PMID42088811
PMCPMC13138383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.