ArticleCureus2026
Public Education on Epistaxis Management: Does a Video Help?
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Epistaxis is a common complaint seen by otolaryngologists and one of the most common otolaryngological emergencies. The aim of our study is to identify educational gaps in home epistaxis management and determine the efficacy of an educational video in increasing layperson knowledge of epistaxis treatment. Methods Adults aged 18 years and older were recruited in pediatric otolaryngology clinics and online. The survey consisted of pre- and post-test questions, with a locally produced educational video on epistaxis management presented between assessments. Demographics collected included age, gender, race, and parental status. Experience with nosebleeds and nasal cautery was queried. The assessment included 10 multiple-choice and true/false questions regarding active nosebleed management and prevention techniques. Results A total of 145 participants completed both assessments. The majority were female (N = 87, 60.0%), younger than 30 years (N = 120, 82.8%), and of Caucasian/White race (N = 103, 71.0%). Nineteen participants (13.1%) identified as parents, and 109 (75.2%) reported personal or child experience with epistaxis. Post-test scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores (mean difference = 2.21, t(144) = 13.10, p < 0.001). Parents had significantly higher post-test scores compared to non-parents (p = 0.025). There was no statistically significant difference in post-test scores based on gender, age, race, history of epistaxis, or history of nasal cautery. Conclusion The educational video increased layperson knowledge about epistaxis. Future research is needed to understand how to best use educational videos in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.