Article in AWWA water science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Jonathan G PressmanCenter for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6203-7421
David G WahmanCenter for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0167-8468
George A SorialDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Toby T SananCenter for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0186-2089
Eva K StebelCenter for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Brooke N GrayDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Esther W HughesDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Eric J KleinerCenter for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8307-8625
Sophia G PedigoOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Cameron X GastaldoCenter for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Samantha J SmithDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3142-3981
Levi M HaupertCenter for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7090-7773
Jonathan B BurkhardtCenter for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2935-4422
Funding
Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Water characteristic impacts on granular activated carbon (Filtrasorb 400) adsorption of nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) were studied. Multispecies competitive isotherms had lower effective solid phase capacities (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Perfluoroalkyl Chemical Adsorption by Granular Activated Carbon: Impacts of Source Water Characteristics. · full record | OpenQuestion