ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Deep learning-based automated detection of fetal corpus callosum abnormalities in prenatal ultrasound.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Corpus Callosum Anomalies: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Prenatal detection of corpus callosum (CC) abnormalities is essential for assessing fetal neurodevelopment, yet conventional ultrasound diagnosis faces challenges from operator variability and suboptimal fetal positioning. Methods: We developed a novel deep learning framework CC-FocusNet that integrates automated region localization with an anatomy-aware dual-stream architecture for multi-view analysis. The model was trained on 496 cases and validated on an independent external cohort of 93 cases. We assessed both diagnostic performance and clinical interpretability through attention visualization. Results: Our framework achieved 97.36% accuracy on the external test set. Grad-CAM++ heatmaps revealed that model attention consistently focused on clinically relevant anatomical landmarks, demonstrating strong interpretability. When integrated into clinical workflows, the AI system enhanced diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, particularly reducing misdiagnosis rates in challenging cases. Conclusions: This interpretable AI system provides accurate and efficient prenatal detection of CC abnormalities, offering substantial potential to support clinical decision-making and enable timely intervention for at-risk pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.