Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088738›Full record

ArticleQualitative report (Online)2024

How to Develop a Qualitative Evaluation Plan for a Complex National Intervention: Key Steps and Reflections from the RADx-UP Program.

Shelly A Maras, Josephine McKelvy, Kelley Milligan, Allyson Kelley, Valerie A Lucas, Tara Carr, Abisola Osinuga, Leah M Frerichs, Gaurav Dave

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative report (Online), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shelly A MarasUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Josephine McKelvyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Kelley MilliganAllyson Kelley and Associates PLLC. Sisters, Oregon, USA.
Allyson KelleyAllyson Kelley and Associates PLLC. Sisters, Oregon, USA.
Valerie A LucasUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Tara CarrUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Abisola OsinugaUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Leah M FrerichsUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Gaurav DaveUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

RADx-UP SAY YES COVID Test Study (S4)U24MD016258 · NIMHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN-WOLKOWIEZ, MICHAEL, DAVE, GAURAV J · 2020 to 2023
$116.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS U24 MD016258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes the formative process of developing and implementing a Qualitative Evaluation Plan (QEP) for a large-scale, National Institute of Health (NIH) supported program: Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics - Underserved Populations (RADx-UP). RADx-UP includes over 137 projects in the United States that aim to ensure that all Americans have access to timely, accurate diagnostics for COVID-19, with a specific focus on populations the pandemic disproportionately affects. As part of a comprehensive, mixed-methods strategic evaluation plan, our team developed the QEP. We employed qualitative methods to understand RADx-UP academic and community partners' experiences implementing community-engaged research strategies, and to understand how projects addressed COVID-19 outreach, testing, and response efforts in-depth. This paper describes how our evaluation team developed the QEP in three phases. Within these phases, we describe our processes related to planning the QEP, sampling from a diverse frame of projects, creating interview guides, collecting interview data, analyzing data, and disseminating findings. We provide our key takeaways and lessons learned from creating a QEP for a large-scale research initiative that other researchers may consider when creating similar evaluation plans.

Indexed as

community-engaged researchCOVID-19 pandemicin-depth interviewslessons learnedqualitative evaluation planRADx-UP

Identifiers

PMID42088738
PMCPMC13138717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.