Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088706›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Results from a prospective international real-world registry of sutureless aortic bioprosthesis by a minimally invasive approach.

Giovanni Concistrè, Max Baghai, Giuseppe Santarpino, Alistair Royse, Mattia Glauber, Marco Solinas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giovanni ConcistrèDepartment of Adult Cardiac Surgery, G Pasquinucci Heart Hospital, Massa, Italy.
Max BaghaiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Giuseppe SantarpinoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Città di Lecce Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Lecce, Italy.
Alistair RoyseDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Mattia GlauberDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Gruppo San Donato, Milano, Italy.
Marco SolinasDepartment of Adult Cardiac Surgery, G Pasquinucci Heart Hospital, Massa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to report clinical and hemodynamic results from a real-world registry of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis, comparing mini-sternotomy (MS) versus mini-thoracotomy (MT) approach. Methods: This prospective international registry enrolled 1,652 patients across 55 institutions between 2011 and 2021. Patients undergoing isolated AVR by minimally invasive cardiac surgery approaches were analyzed. Preoperative covariates were adjusted using 1:1 propensity score matching, reaching a final cohort of 261 patients for each approach. Results: Isolated AVR via minimally invasive approaches was performed in 710 patients-406 in MS and 304 in MT. After matching, the baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, except for the preoperative NYHA class distribution. MT was associated with shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays ( Discussion: Our propensity-matched analysis demonstrates that the use of Perceval in minimally invasive approaches is associated with low perioperative complication rates. Sutureless implanted in MT has lower intensive care and in-hospital stay without significant differences in long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.

Indexed as

aortic stenosisaortic valve replacementminimally invasive proceduresreal-world evidencesutureless valves

Identifiers

PMID42088706
PMCPMC13137364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.