ArticleBrain & spine2026
Clinical impact and predictive value of patient specific pre-bent rods in spinal deformity surgery: A comparative analysis of preoperative planned and postoperative outcomes.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patient-specific rods (PSRs) represent an emerging technology for spinal deformity correction, offering personalized surgical planning based on individual anatomy. Research question: How accurately do PSRs achieve planned sagittal alignment corrections, and what factors influence surgical outcomes and complications? Material and methods: Twenty-two consecutive patients underwent spinal deformity correction using UNiD™ PSRs. Two novel metrics were developed: Correction Achievement Ratio (CAR) and Correction Maintenance Index (CMI). Radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at one-year follow-up. Results: Twenty patients (91%) completed follow-up. PI-LL mismatch (CAR = 102.8%) and TPA (CAR = 91.9%) achieved near-perfect correction. PT (CAR = 149.2%) and SS (CAR = 123.5%) showed overcorrection. Learning curve analysis revealed improved accuracy after case 8. Overcorrection significantly increased complication risk (PT>120%: OR = 3.41, p = 0.025; PI-LL>120%: OR = 4.25, p = 0.007). Discussion and conclusion: PSRs effectively achieve planned sagittal corrections with high initial accuracy. However, maintaining correction remains challenging, and overcorrection increases complication risk. Surgical precision improves with experience. While promising for reducing mechanical complications, the technology requires further refinement for optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.