Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088690›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Does campus sports environment matter for physical fitness? The mediating roles of peer support and perceived physical literacy.

Mingliang Song, Qishun Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mingliang Song *School of Football, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China.
Qishun Yang *School of Physical Education, Wuhan Business University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Physical inactivity and declining physical fitness among Chinese college students remain important public health concerns. This study examined whether perceived campus sports environment was prospectively associated with physical fitness through peer support and perceived physical literacy, and explored gender differences in key variables. Methods: A two-wave prospective observational study was conducted among 1,165 undergraduates (56.3% female; M_age = 19.1 ± 0.89) from five universities in Hubei Province, China. At T1, participants completed measures of perceived campus sports environment, peer support, and perceived physical literacy. At T2, physical fitness was assessed according to the National Student Physical Fitness Standards using sex-specific standardized item scores and the official composite scoring procedure. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, independent-samples t tests, and serial mediation analysis using PROCESS Model 6 with 5,000 bootstrap samples were conducted. Results: Male students reported significantly higher perceived facility access and peer-support indicators than female students, whereas no significant gender differences were observed in perceived physical literacy or physical fitness. Perceived campus sports environment ( Conclusion: These findings suggest that campus sports environment, peer support, and perceived physical literacy should be considered together when interpreting differences in university students' physical fitness. Strategies that foster supportive campus sport cultures and strengthen students' perceived physical literacy may help support physical fitness in university settings, with particular attention to female students' relatively lower perceived facility access and peer-support indicators.

Indexed as

chain mediationpeer supportperceived campus sports environmentperceived physical literacyphysical fitness

Identifiers

PMID42088690
PMCPMC13136009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.