Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088675›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

The impact of silence pedagogy on vulnerable students' engagement in physical education: a mini-review.

Qing Deng, Qing Jun Wang, Xue Feng Wang, Xiang Qian Mou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qing DengSchool of Sports Science and Physical Education, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
Qing Jun WangSchool of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
Xue Feng WangSchool of Physical Education, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China.
Xiang Qian MouSchool of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, improving vulnerable students' engagement in the classroom has received increasing attention from researchers. Existing literature indicates that vulnerable students with low levels of classroom engagement often show signs of confused thinking, distracted attention, and insufficient learning investment. This phenomenon has been widely discussed among researchers in the field of education. To improve classroom engagement among vulnerable students, researchers have proposed various interventions. One of these interventions is the implementation of silence pedagogy in the classroom. However, existing research on silence pedagogy has mainly focused on mathematics and foreign language classrooms, whereas research in physical education (PE) remains limited. This raises questions about what silence pedagogy is and how it affects vulnerable students' engagement in PE classes. Drawing on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) search strategy, we conducted a systematic search of databases such as the Web of Science and Scopus and included 21 articles. We then reviewed these articles and examined the definition of silence pedagogy and its impact on students' engagement. The analysis revealed that silence pedagogy could enhance vulnerable students' cognitive, behavioral, and emotional engagement. This study extends the existing knowledge base on silence pedagogy by reviewing its effects on classroom engagement among vulnerable students in PE contexts.

Indexed as

behavioral engagementcognitive engagementemotional engagementphysical educationsilence pedagogyvulnerable students

Identifiers

PMID42088675
PMCPMC13136096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.