Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088624›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research. Water2026

Post-wildfire water quality and aquatic ecosystem response in the U.S. Pacific Northwest: science and monitoring gaps.

Sara Wall, Jana E Compton, Ashley A Coble, Beth M Haley, Jiajia Lin, Allison Myers-Pigg, Justin Reale, Katie Wampler, Allison Swartz, Kevan Moffett and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research. Water, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Sara WallPacific Northwest Research Station, Olympia, WA 98512, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3673-1126
Jana E ComptonPacific Ecological Systems Division, Corvallis, OR 97333, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9833-8664
Ashley A CobleNational Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI), Corvallis, OR 97330, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5821-5026
Beth M HaleyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, Newport, OR 97365, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0236-4687
Jiajia LinOregon Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, Portland, OR 97232, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1493-2832
Allison Myers-PiggMarine and Coastal Research Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Sequim, WA 98382, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6905-6841
Justin RealeU.S. Geological Survey, Oregon Water Science Center, Portland, OR 97204, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3523-4782
Katie WamplerForest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5584-7554
Allison SwartzForest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2006-1455
Kevan MoffettSchool of the Environment, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-819X
Kevin D BladonForest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-6883
Kurt CarpenterU.S. Geological Survey, Oregon Water Science Center, Portland, OR 97204, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6231-8335
Heejun ChangSchool of Earth, Environment, and Society, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5605-6500
Junjie ChenOregon Department of Water Resources, Salem, OR 97301, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1396-1180
David DonahueDrinking Water Protection, Eugene Water & Electric Board, Eugene, OR 97402, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0008-9826-769X
Chris S EckleyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region-10, Seattle, WA 98101, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6986-4451
Amanda K HohnerDepartment of Civil Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7704-4464
Peter M KiffneyNOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Fish Ecology Division, Seattle, WA 98112, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0863-0085
Lorrayne MiralhaDepartment of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1448-9321
Peter RegierMarine and Coastal Research Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Sequim, WA 98382, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8375-1314
Joshua SeedsOregon Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, Portland, OR 97232, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0009-9733-4528
Mark RiverWeyerhaeuser Company, Eugene, OR 97405, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0005-4967-8087

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increase in the occurrence of large, high severity wildfires in the western Pacific Northwest (PNW), USA, has created an urgent need for science to better inform forest management and policy decisions to maintain source water quality in the region. The western PNW faces similar challenges to other regions with shifting wildfire regimes and large population centers reliant on surface water from forested catchments. However, the uniquely wet and highly seasonal climate of the western PNW suggests that findings from other, more frequently burned regions may not be directly applicable. To identify science, monitoring, and management gaps and opportunities in the western PNW, this review was collaboratively undertaken by academics, non-government and industry representatives, and local, state, and federal government entities who have been working together since the 2020 Labor Day fires in Oregon. Focusing on Oregon and Washington, we found that monitoring networks for continuous water quantity and quality cover much of the state with greater representation in western U.S. ecoregions, but few studies have analyzed and published these data to capture and communicate the post-wildfire response. Approximately half of the streamgages in Oregon and Washington record major water quality parameters, and hundreds of sites in the area have discrete sampling for a wide range of water quality constituents. Still, numerous gaps exist in understanding the short- and long-term impacts of wildfire on hydrology, water chemistry, including pH and dissolved oxygen, mobilization of metals, aquatic ecosystems, and downstream drinking water treatment. Collective action to further collect, analyze, interpret, and publish the key data could help improve our understanding of post-wildfire water quality impacts in this and other increasingly wildfire-affected regions.

Indexed as

carbongap analysishydrologymetalsnutrientswaterwildfire

Identifiers

PMID42088624
PMCPMC13137517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.