ArticleNAR cancer2026
Efficient gene disruption with CRISPR-Cas3 in human T cells.
Article in NAR cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The CRISPR-Cas9 system has been widely adopted as a genome editing tool due to its high efficiency and versatility, contributing to the development of various therapeutic strategies. However, its clinical application remains limited by safety concerns, including off-target effects and large-scale chromosomal rearrangements such as translocations and inversions. Recently, the CRISPR-Cas3 system, a Class 1 CRISPR effector complex with unidirectional DNA degradation activity, has gained attention as a potential alternative, offering reduced off-target activity. In this study, we applied the CRISPR-Cas3 system to human T cells and successfully disrupted two clinically relevant genes, T cell receptor alpha constant (TRAC) and beta-2 microglobulin (B2M). These gene deletions were associated with a reduction in both graft-versus-host disease risk and host immune rejection. Importantly, no off-target mutations were detected in CRISPR-Cas3-edited cells, in contrast to the off-target effects observed with CRISPR-Cas9. Furthermore, CAR-T cells generated by deleting
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.