Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088605›Full record

ArticleJournal of hazardous materials letters2024

Closing PFAS analytical gaps: Inter-method evaluation of total organofluorine techniques for AFFF-impacted water.

Fuhar Dixit, Edmund H Antell, Katharine A Faber, Chuhui Zhang, Manmeet W Pannu, Megan H Plumlee, Jean Van Buren, Abraham Doroshow, William C K Pomerantz, William A Arnold and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hazardous materials letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. EstablishingAnalytical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Fuhar DixitDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
Edmund H AntellDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
Katharine A FaberDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geo-Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Chuhui ZhangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, United States.
Manmeet W PannuOrange County Water District, Fountain Valley, CA 92708, United States.
Megan H PlumleeOrange County Water District, Fountain Valley, CA 92708, United States.
Jean Van BurenCenter for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Abraham DoroshowORAU National Student Services Contractor to Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
William C K PomerantzDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
William A ArnoldDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geo-Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Christopher P HigginsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, United States.
Graham F PeasleeDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, United States.
Lisa Alvarez-CohenDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
David L SedlakDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
Mohamed AteiaCenter for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are present in aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) used for firefighting activities. Currently, no single analytical technique provides a complete accounting of total PFASs or total organofluorine content in AFFF-contaminated samples. To provide insight into the performance of existing methods, we compared ten previously described PFAS measurement techniques. In AFFF-amended tap water, US EPA Methods 533 and 1633, adsorbable organic fluorine with particle induced gamma emission spectroscopy (AOF-PIGE) and fluorine-19 nuclear magnetic resonance (

Indexed as

Analytical methodsAOF-CICAOF-PIGE and 19F NMRGC-MS/MSLC/MS-MSPFASsSuspect screeningTOP assay

Identifiers

PMID42088605
PMCPMC13138002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.