ReviewBone reports2026
Spaceflight and the rodent skeleton: A perspective.
Review in Bone reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adaptations to extreme environments, such as spaceflight, are often studied using model organisms. Beyond basic science goals, validated model organisms are used to better understand human responses. The skeleton, the topic of this perspective, is an important gravity-sensitive organ with structure-to-function relationships that are altered during spaceflight. Here we describe how small rodents have been used during the past 5 decades to understand the skeletal response to spaceflight with an emphasis on changes in bone mass, architecture and quality, and the cellular mechanisms mediating these changes. Additionally, we consider the strengths and limitations of rodents for modeling human response and the unique challenges of the spaceflight environment for designing experiments and collecting and interpreting data. We also evaluate the extent to which these model organisms have increased our understanding of skeletal adaptation to microgravity. Taken together, there is strong evidence that spaceflight influences bone accrual and turnover, often resulting in lower bone mass compared to age-matched ground-based controls. However, the skeletal response to spaceflight is not uniform, the cellular mechanisms for observed changes remain elusive, and the molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. Importantly, it is difficult to distinguish the specific skeletal effects of weightlessness (microgravity) from those associated with the spacecraft environment. Since microgravity during orbital spaceflight is constant, the differences across studies are likely due to coexisting intrinsic and extrinsic factors, including species, sex, age, duration of flight, and housing conditions. While rodent studies provide novel insight into adaptation of the mammalian skeleton to microgravity, because of important species differences in skeletal maturation, metabolism and bone physiology, comparisons of rodents to astronauts should currently be made with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.