ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2026
Evaluating real-world uptake of the online Military to Civilian Adjustment and Reintegration Measure among former military members.
Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated real-world engagement with the online Military to Civilian Adjustment and Reintegration Measure (M-CARM) platform, described user characteristics and usage patterns, and examined score distributions, factor structure and variability in a naturalistic online sample relative to the original validation study. Method: Website analytics (2022-2025) and M-CARM completion data (December 2020-February 2025) were analysed to assess reach, uptake, and engagement. Following data cleaning, 1,101 unique responses were retained. Group differences were examined using t-tests, ANOVAs, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the fit of the hypothesised five-factor structure. Results: The platform received 10,155 site visits with an 11.2% completion rate among users who accessed the assessment page. Users were predominantly male, aged 26-45 and from the Army. The CFA demonstrated acceptable model fit and strong item loadings. Exploratory analyses identified that Navy users had lower total scores and higher odds of Resentment and Regret, and older veterans (56-75) were less likely to meet criteria for this need compared with younger groups. Conclusions: This is the first study to examine real-world engagement with the M-CARM platform, highlighting the M-CARM's translational potential as a scalable, accessible digital tool for identifying reintegration needs among veterans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.