Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088586›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Comparison of sterilisation methods for deer velvet antler extracts and their impact on anticancer activity.

Nicolás Alegría-Aravena, Josefa Quiroz-Troncoso, Marta Sánchez-Díez, Clara Gavira-O'Neill, Raquel González-Martos, Irene Arroyo-González, Datao Wang, Carlos de Cabo, Andrés J García-Díaz, María-Pilar López-Garrido and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nicolás Alegría-Aravena *IDR, IREC and ETSIAMB, University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
Josefa Quiroz-Troncoso *Centro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Sánchez-DíezCentro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Clara Gavira-O'NeillCentro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Raquel González-MartosCentro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Irene Arroyo-GonzálezIDR, IREC and ETSIAMB, University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
Datao WangIDR, IREC and ETSIAMB, University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
Carlos de CaboInstitute for Health Research of Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), Albacete, Spain.
Andrés J García-DíazIDR, IREC and ETSIAMB, University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
María-Pilar López-GarridoInstitute for Health Research of Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), Albacete, Spain.
Martina Pérez SerranoDepartamento de Producción Agraria, ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Sánchez-Sánchez *Institute for Health Research of Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), Albacete, Spain.
Tomás Landete-Castillejos *IDR, IREC and ETSIAMB, University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
Louis Chonco *IDR, IREC and ETSIAMB, University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
Carmen Ramírez-Castillejo *Centro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural extracts tested for potential effects in human health are susceptible to contamination, particularly when samples are often obtained from outdoor environments. Deer velvet antler (DVA) extracts have broad anticancer effects. As sterile samples are required for effective experimentation in cell cultures, we evaluated the most common sterilisation methods to get rid of microbial contamination. We also investigated whether the sterilisation method affected the anti-cancer activity of the DVA extract on human tumour cells. Two antler sections (tip and base) were subjected to water-based extraction. This study compares lyophilised and non-lyophilised DVA extracts. Subsequently, DMEM and LB culture media containing DVA extract were assessed for contamination. The amount of protein was quantified by BCA and visualised by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. To analyse the anticancer effect, a cell viability assay was performed on colorectal cancer cell lines. Finally, tumour biomarkers were evaluated by flow cytometry in colorectal cancer cells. Filtration was the sterilisation method that removed the highest microbial load. It reduced cell viability at a concentration of 1 mg/mL of total protein by up to 37% ± 10% (DVA-T) and by up to 69% ± 8% (DVA-B). Furthermore, the protein expression levels of SW480 colorectal cancer cells exhibited a significant increase in response to lyophilised DVA extracts in comparison to non-lyophilised extracts. The data obtained from this study indicate that the selected sterilization approaches allow preservation of protein integrity and

Indexed as

anticancer activitycolorectal cancerdeer antler extractdeer velvet antlernatural bioactive compoundssterilisation methods

Identifiers

PMID42088586
PMCPMC13136180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.