Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088570›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2026

Myotendinous Junction development and repair.

Kun Yang, Zi Yin, Chunmei Fan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kun YangDepartment of Sports Medicine & Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, and Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zi YinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, and Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Chunmei FanCenter of Frontier Science Research and Transformation, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The myotendinous junction (MTJ) is the critical interface connecting muscle to tendon, enabling force transmission for movement and serving as the primary site of muscle injuries. Despite research into MTJ repair, treatment outcomes are suboptimal, partly due to the absence of a comprehensive synthesis of its structural components, cellular diversity, and developmental mechanisms, which impedes the rational selection of materials, cells, and regulatory factors for effective regeneration. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix (ECM) architecture of the MTJ, the cell types involved in its development and repair, and the key molecular regulators governing its formation. We describe the hierarchical architecture of the MTJ and the key molecular complexes that mediate the mechanical connection between the muscle and the tendon. We also describe the roles of Col22a1-expressing muscle nuclei and various resident stem/progenitor cells in MTJ maintenance and healing. We discuss essential regulatory signaling pathways, including Slit, LRT, and BMP4. Furthermore, we evaluate existing MTJ repair strategies. Based on a review of MTJ development and injury repair, we observe that current treatment approaches largely fail to incorporate key insights from MTJ development, particularly regarding stem/progenitor cells and regulatory signals. Therefore, we propose that tissue engineering techniques, by integrating MTJ-resident stem/progenitor cells such as CD106 The Translational Potential of this Article: This review summarizes MTJ development across molecular linkages, signaling regulation, cellular composition, and tissue architecture, while assessing MTJ injury repair in terms of efficacy, mechanisms, limitations, and translational paths. Key barriers of MTJ repair include: conventional treatments (conservative and surgical) lacking high-quality data, RCTs, and unified guidelines for diverse patients; emerging approaches (bioactive factors, cell therapies, decellularized ECM scaffolds, tissue engineering) stuck at proof-of-concept or small-animal stages, without large-animal validation. It proposes establishing standardized cohorts, protocols, and parameters for conventional methods; accelerating large-animal safety/efficacy testing for emerging approaches to speed translation; constructing MTJ organoids based on key developmental cells and cues to provide a rapid drug testing platform for MTJ injury, thereby accelerating clinical translation; and integrating MTJ regulatory signals and stem/progenitor cells to enhance emerging therapy outcomes.

Indexed as

CytoskeletonDevelopmentExtracellular matrixMyotendinous junctionRepairStem/progenitor cell

Identifiers

PMID42088570
PMCPMC13137148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.