ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Optimizing hospice care: A scoping review of staffing strategies to enhance practice.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Strategic hospice staffing is essential to optimize patient care and strengthen workforce performance and retention, particularly as aging populations and rising rates of life-limiting illnesses increase the demand for end-of-life care. Despite growing recognition of staffing challenges in hospice care, there is limited synthesis of evidence on effective models and practices that support high-quality, sustainable care delivery. Objective: This scoping review aimed to synthesize evidence on workforce characteristics and strategies that support sustainable, high-quality hospice care. Information sources: Literature published after 2013 was searched in Ovid MEDLINE, EBSCOhost CINAHL, Ovid Embase, and Google Scholar to capture both peer-reviewed and grey literature sources relevant to hospice staffing and care quality. Methods: The review followed the PRISMA-ScR framework and was guided by the Arksey and O'Malley five-stage methodology. Search terms reflected three dimensions: 1) adult hospice care, 2) hospice staffing, and 3) the quality and effectiveness of care. Articles were included if they discussed hospice or palliative care staffing models, workforce characteristics, or operational performance metrics. Results: Forty-seven articles were included (33 peer-reviewed publications and 14 grey literature sources), representing hospice and palliative care settings across 11 countries, with the United States most frequently studied. Core strategies to enhance workforce sustainability and patient care included staffing composition and competency, key care approaches, and volunteer integration Findings highlighted that having an appropriately structured and well-prepared workforce is critical for ensuring quality care, while strategies that promote staff well-being and streamline processes further enhance service delivery. Collectively, these themes point to guiding principles for hospice staffing: adaptable, patient-responsive models; strong interdisciplinary collaboration; ongoing training and support; and the strategic use of volunteers and technology. Conclusions: This review synthesizes international evidence on hospice staffing and identifies common principles that can guide practice. Taken together, these practical insights highlight an urgent need for rigorous evaluation to move beyond fragmented approaches and establish sustainable, equitable, and patient-centred staffing standards. Developing and implementing such standards is essential not only for workforce stability, but also for ensuring high-quality, compassionate care for patients and families at the end of life. Registration: Not registered. Social media abstract: Interdisciplinary, flexible staffing models improve hospice care quality and support workforce sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.