ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
The application and challenges of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer therapy.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research trends in cytokine regulation of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a bibliometric and BERTopic analysis from 2015 to 2025.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains a leading cause of global cancer-related mortality, with most patients diagnosed at advanced stages. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), specifically targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways, has revolutionized the treatment landscape by restoring anti-tumor immune responses. Currently, ICIs are integrated into clinical practice across all stages of lung cancer, administered either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and anti-angiogenic agents. Despite significant survival benefits, several critical challenges persist. First, primary and acquired resistance, driven by tumor microenvironment (TME) immunosuppression, impaired antigen presentation, and aberrant signaling, limits long-term efficacy. Second, existing biomarkers like PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) face limitations due to insufficient standardization and spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Furthermore, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) across multiple organ systems necessitate vigilant clinical management and occasionally treatment discontinuation. This review systematically evaluates the research progress and clinical applications of ICI therapy in lung cancer. We highlight the therapeutic heterogeneity observed across different histological types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), with a specific focus on the management of brain metastases (BMs). Additionally, the article discusses varying response patterns within specific patient subgroups, such as geriatric patients and individuals with differing smoking or performance statuses. By synthesizing data on both favorable therapeutic outcomes and the spectrum of irAEs, we emphasize the necessity of personalized immunotherapy. Ultimately, this review looks forward to future advancements aimed at enhancing the precision and safety of lung cancer treatment, providing a roadmap for more tailored clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.