ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Evaluation of dnDSA risk stratification using the updated PIRCHE-T2 model in two kidney transplant cohorts.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Development of Methods: We compared the predictive performance of the previous and updated PIRCHE-T2 models in two independent kidney transplant cohorts from Zurich (n = 1194) and Basel (n = 387). PIRCHE-T2 scores were assessed at total and locus-specific levels and analyzed in relation to dnDSA incidence using ROC curves, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression models. Results: The updated PIRCHE-T2 model generated lower and more condensed scores but improved dnDSA risk stratification across both cohorts. Higher scores remained associated with increased dnDSA risk. Notable improvements were observed for HLA-C scores. HLA-DQ also showed enhanced performance in one-mismatch subgroups and Cox models, while HLA-A improvements were primarily seen in the Basel cohort. Results for other loci remained similar between models, although HLA-DRB1 showed cohort-specific variation, highlighting the need for context-specific threshold refinement. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that the updated PIRCHE-T2 model refines immunological risk stratification in kidney transplantation, offering improved performance for certain loci and patient subgroups. Its application may support more precise donor selection and individualized immunological assessment. Given observed cohort-specific differences, future work should focus on optimizing thresholds and validating the model across diverse populations to ensure broader clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.