Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088483›Full record

ArticleGlobal & regional health technology assessment

Cost minimization analysis of subcutaneous and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in Italy.

Chiara Bini, Matteo Scortichini, Silvia Ripoli, Laura Fioravanti, Carmela Papa, Paolo Sciattella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global & regional health technology assessment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chiara BiniCentre for Economics and International Studies-Economic Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5704-6542
Matteo ScortichiniCentre for Economics and International Studies-Economic Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome - Italy.
Silvia RipoliPatient Value & Access Department, Takeda Italia S.p.A., Rome - Italy.
Laura FioravantiPatient Value & Access Department, Takeda Italia S.p.A., Rome - Italy.
Carmela PapaMedical & Regulatory Department, Takeda Italia S.p.A., Rome - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7575-5260
Paolo SciattellaCentre for Economics and International Studies-Economic Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome - Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Human immunoglobulins are the standard of care for patients with immunodeficiencies and represent a first-line treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). This study aimed to evaluate costs associated with facilitated subcutaneous (fSCIG), conventional subcutaneous (cSCIG), and intravenous (IVIG) administration of immunoglobulin in patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiency (PID and SID, respectively) and in patients with CIDP in Italy. Methods: A cost-minimization analysis from a societal perspective was developed, considering a one-year follow-up. Direct costs included acquisition and administration costs, while indirect costs were evaluated considering productivity loss due to in-hospital IVIG using a Human Capital Approach. The posology considered for immunodeficiency disorders and CIDP was obtained from observational studies and clinical trials, respectively. Subcutaneous and intravenous administration costs were obtained from published literature. Scenario analyses were conducted to test the key assumptions of the model. Results: This study indicates a potential reduction of annual societal expenditure in Italy of approximately €2,145 and €1,605 with fSCIG treatment in PID patients compared to cSCIG and IVIG, respectively. In SID patients, fSCIG would result in a reduction of societal expenditure of approximately €2,145 and €2,071 compared to cSCIG and IVIG. For CIDP patients, fSCIG treatment would result in a reduction of societal expenditure of €8,060 and €15,873 compared to cSCIG and IVIG, respectively. Conclusion: The use of fSCIG for patients with PIDs, SIDs or CIDP could lead to a reduction in the direct and indirect costs associated with the treatment of patients.

Indexed as

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathyCost-minimization analysisFacilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulinImmunodeficiency

Identifiers

PMID42088483
PMCPMC13136886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.