Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088462›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026

Deterministic, stochastic, and mean-field PDE models in neuroscience.

Coşkun Çetin, Jose Roberto Castilho Piqueira, Burhaneddin İzgi, Ayse Peker-Dobie, Semra Ahmetolan, Murat Özkaya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Coşkun ÇetinDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, California State University, CSU, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Jose Roberto Castilho PiqueiraEscola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Burhaneddin İzgiDepartment of Mathematics Engineering, Faculty of Science and Letters, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ayse Peker-DobieDepartment of Mathematics Engineering, Faculty of Science and Letters, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Semra AhmetolanDepartment of Mathematics Engineering, Faculty of Science and Letters, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Murat ÖzkayaDepartment of Business, Faculty of Political Sciences, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large neuronal networks demonstrate complex dynamics across multiple scales, ranging from single-neuron excitability and spike-train variability to mesoscopic rhythms and whole-brain activity. Different types of differential equation models have been developed to comprehend these phenomena, connecting deterministic, stochastic, and mean-field descriptions. At the deterministic level, ordinary differential equation (ODE) models, including conductance-based neuron models, neural-mass systems, and whole-brain networks, summarize neural behavior through a reduced set of macroscopic variables. At the population level, mean-field partial differential equation (PDE) models such as Fokker-Planck, age-structured, kinetic, and neural field equations describe the evolution of probability or population densities over membrane-potentials, synaptic states, and other kinetic variables. These PDEs link single-neuron mechanisms to population-level activity and allow one to analyze bifurcations, oscillations and other collective patterns. Stochastic differential equation (SDE) models and their extensions that include jump-diffusion processes and stochastic PDEs (SPDEs) are widely used to describe random membrane fluctuations, irregular spike trains, synaptic plasticity and large-scale variability in neural activity. These stochastic models are also applied to neural data analysis, for example to quantify noise in electro-physiological recordings and to infer latent neural dynamics. Because variability and noise are central in neural systems, we devote more space to stochastic models but always relate them back to the surrounding ODE and PDE frameworks. This hierarchy of ODE, PDE, and SDE-SPDE models shows that the versatility of differential-equation-based approaches in neuroscience offers unified tools for multiscale modeling, neural signal processing, cognitive modeling, and the analysis of noisy neural systems. We also discuss some known numerical and computational approaches, especially for stochastic models and conclude by outlining open challenges, such as multiscale inference, control-oriented formulations and the integration of differential-equation models with modern machine-learning methods.

Indexed as

computational neurosciencedifferential equation modelsFokker-Planck equationsmean-field partial differential equationsnumerical methodsstochastic differential equationsstochastic neural dynamics

Identifiers

PMID42088462
PMCPMC13136274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.