ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2026
Using Carrier DNA in Ultra-Low Input Library Preparations for Next-Generation Sequencing.
Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of carrier DNA (i.e., exogenous DNA spike-in) for shotgun metagenome sequencing of ultra-low levels (less than 50 picograms) of metagenomic DNA. The study hypothesized that carrier DNA would improve the robustness of library preparation for samples with DNA concentrations that are below detection by providing a tangible amount of known DNA thereby bringing total DNA concentrations closer to recommended input ranges for metagenomic library kits. The study employed adaptive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycling using an iconPCR instrument (N6tec) to allow dynamic thermocycling until a sufficient library for sequencing was amplified, regardless of the input DNA concentration. Libraries were sequenced and mapped in order to reference genomes of Lambda and mock community organisms, and outcome measures included total reads, on-target reads, evenness of coverage across 10 organisms within each mock community, and PCR duplication rate. The study demonstrated that libraries can be prepared down to 50 fg of input DNA, but there is a strong correlation between input DNA concentration and PCR duplication rate. The utility of spiking in carrier DNA is equivocal as it has mild negative impacts on the observed distribution of mock communities and serves as a loss of sequencing output. Although the loss of sequencing capacity due to carrier DNA can be partially offset by a reduced loss of data from PCR duplication, carrier DNA spike-in is not recommended for routine library preparation of ultra-low input samples. Adaptive cycling allows for appropriate cycling conditions when input DNA concentrations are below detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.