ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
How Selective are Nanomaterials to Treat Osteoarthritis.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is now increasingly recognized as a disease that affects the entire joint, where synovial inflammation plays a key role in pain, cartilage degeneration, and structural progression. Synovial macrophages (SMs) are key regulators in this process due to their phenotypic plasticity and central roles in amplifying inflammation, disrupting immunometabolism, and interacting with other joint-resident cells. These characteristics make SMs attractive targets for disease-modifying interventions. However, conventional therapies are limited by poor intra-articular retention, low cellular selectivity, and inadequate control over complex pathogenic networks. This review summarizes the biological functions of SMs in OA and explains why they are a mechanistically important and therapeutically accessible target. Next, we provide a structured overview of nanomaterial-based strategies for SM-targeted OA therapy, covering major material platforms, receptor-guided delivery approaches, subset- and state-selective targeting, intracellular functional intervention, and multi-target combination designs. We highlight representative studies that show how nanomedicines can improve local retention, enhance macrophage-specific uptake, and modulate inflammation, metabolism, oxidative stress, and cell fate. Finally, we discuss the major barriers to clinical translation, such as macrophage heterogeneity, safety, pharmacokinetics, and chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC), and outline future directions for biomarker-guided and precision nanotherapy in OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.