Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088398›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026

Advancements in Neonatal Brain Injury Treatment: Nanomedicine-Based Strategies.

Peili Jin, Chuanchuan He, Xiaojuan Zhang, Yimin Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peili JinCollege of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, People's Republic of China.
Chuanchuan HeDepartment of Central Laboratory, Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Affiliated Women and Children Hospital, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaojuan ZhangCollege of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, People's Republic of China.
Yimin HuangDepartment of Central Laboratory, Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Affiliated Women and Children Hospital, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal brain injury, such as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), is a leading cause of infant mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental disabilities. Current clinical therapeutic strategies are limited by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), the complexity of the injury cascade, and the narrow therapeutic window. Nanomedicine has shown potential in preclinical studies for overcoming these barriers by leveraging its unique nanoscale characteristics and engineerability design to load, stabilize, and deliver vulnerable biomacromolecules across the compromised BBB to the lesion site. This review presents the first systematic horizontal comparison and critical evaluation of the major nanoplatforms employed in neonatal brain injury therapy. Based on data derived primarily from animal models, we analyze the heterogeneity across studies in model systems, administration routes, and efficacy endpoints, revealing common challenges in the field regarding long-term safety, manufacturability, and reproducibility. This review aims to provide guidance for selecting appropriate nanoplatforms to facilitate the translational advancement of this field toward clinical applications.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainNanomedicineAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierHumansInfant, NewbornNanoparticlesnanocarrierneonatal brain injuryneuroinflammationoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID42088398
PMCPMC13138279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.