SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Maize yield prediction using machine learning: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A crop recommendation using improved expert-guided constraint aware differential evolution and CatBoost surrogate learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate maize yield prediction is critical for food security planning, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where maize is essential to national economies and livelihoods. This systematic review assesses the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in maize yield estimation, focusing on the methodologies, predictor variables, and results in peer-reviewed studies. Methods: The review followed the PRISMA 2021 guidelines, synthesizing 81 peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2025. The analysis examined the ML algorithms, predictor variables, evaluation metrics, and methodological gaps identified in these studies. Results: The review found a significant increase in publications after 2021, reflecting growing confidence in the application of ML for agronomic decision-support. Random Forest (49.4%), XGBoost (16.1%), and Support Vector Machines (12.4%) were the most common algorithms, with hybrid deep-learning frameworks showing superior performance. Environmental variables, remote-sensing indices, and soil properties were the most frequently used predictors. RMSE and Discussion: The findings underscore the challenges of data scarcity, limited interpretability, and geographical imbalance in the research, with Africa contributing less than 25% of the studies. There is a need for open-access agricultural data systems, hybrid explainable AI frameworks, and capacity building in computational agronomy to improve the effectiveness of ML applications in maize yield prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.