Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088265›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Influence of Astigmatism Type on Myopia Progression Among Children Wearing Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) Spectacle Lenses.

Jenna M Hoogendoorn, Rakhee Shah, Laurentius J Van Rijn, Natalia Vlasak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenna M HoogendoornVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-8339-0175
Rakhee ShahOptometry & Visual Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6134-0936
Laurentius J Van RijnDepartment of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC and Department of Ophthalmology, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-478X
Natalia VlasakHOYA Vision Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-4600-6117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to retrospectively analyse two datasets to investigate the correlation between progressive myopia and astigmatism focusing on the influence of the type of astigmatism on myopia progression in children undergoing myopia management with Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses. Patients and Methods: Retrospective right eye data from two anonymised datasets were obtained for analysis: an Asian paediatric population, and a Caucasian paediatric population. Participants' refractive error at baseline was classified into one of four categories: spherical, with-the-rule (WTR), oblique or against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism. Myopia progression was evaluated by the change in Spherical Equivalent Refraction (SER) and Axial Length (AL) between baseline and follow-up visits. Results: Retrospective analyses were conducted on right eye data from 265 children (160 Asian & 105 Caucasian). Linear Mixed Models (LMM) analysis of the combined datasets ( Conclusion: The type of astigmatism affected myopia progression. Participants with WTR-astigmatism wearing DIMS spectacles showed less myopia progression compared to participants with oblique or ATR-astigmatism. Long-term investigations in participants with different types of astigmatism undergoing myopia management are required to better understand the relationship between progressive myopia and astigmatism type.

Indexed as

astigmatismDIMS spectaclesmyopia managementmyopia progression

Identifiers

PMID42088265
PMCPMC13135896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.