Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088251›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Research on the dissemination mechanism of online rumors in public health events based on the SNITR model.

Mengna Zhang, Xin Zhang, Yuqing Chen, Fuzhao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengna ZhangSchool of Management Science and Engineering, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.
Xin ZhangCollege of Public Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.
Yuqing ChenParty and Government Office, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.
Fuzhao LiParty and Government Office, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During public health events, nodes on social networks that are aware of the truth may still actively disseminate rumors, thereby influencing the rumor propagation process. However, existing research has not yet taken into account the impact of transmitter nodes on rumor dissemination. Therefore, our study proposes an SNITR rumor propagation model that incorporates a rumor-transmitter mechanism. When rumor information emerges on social networks, susceptible users may neglect to propagate the received rumor information upon exposure (neglected nodes), some users may believe the rumors and spread them (infected nodes), while others may publicly state the truth to reduce the spread of rumors (transmitter nodes). Eventually, users will enter a recovered state and no longer participate in the rumor propagation process. By introducing the rumor-transmitter mechanism, a competitive coupling mechanism among different user groups is established. Additionally, the dynamics of the rumor propagation model are analyzed, the system's equilibrium points and basic reproduction number are calculated, and it is demonstrated that the equilibrium points are both locally and globally asymptotically stable. Finally, simulation experiments validate the effectiveness of the theoretical model and demonstrate that it aligns well with the intrinsic mechanisms of actual rumor propagation.

Indexed as

CommunicationInformation DisseminationInternetModels, TheoreticalPublic HealthSocial NetworkingHumansequilibrium pointspublic crisis eventsrumor propagation modelrumor-transmitter mechanismtransmitter nodes

Identifiers

PMID42088251
PMCPMC13137442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.