SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Instruments used to measure well-being, ill-being, and health-related lifestyle behaviors in students attending Italian universities: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The well-being of university students is increasingly recognized as a critical public health issue, influenced by complex interactions among psychological, behavioral, and contextual factors. Despite growing research, measurement tools often lack standardization and contextual specificity, limiting the understanding of students' health. This review aimed to map and critically analyze instruments assessing well-being, ill-being, and health-related lifestyle behaviors among Italian university students, as well as the associated variables, including risk and protective factors. Methods: The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and included peer-reviewed studies published from 2010 onward, identified across five databases: Scopus, APA PsycInfo, PubMed, ERIC, and Web of Science. A structured data extraction process was applied to collect information on sample characteristics, health-related outcomes, and associated variables (protective and risk factors). Descriptive statistics were used to synthesize frequencies, proportions, and distributions of measurement instruments and constructs across the included studies. Results: A total of 223 studies were included. Samples were largely non-probabilistic and female-biased. Ill-being measures appeared exclusively in 66.3% of the studies, while 7.9% focused on well-being, and 25.8% included both. A total of 159 instruments assessing well-being and ill-being were identified. Of these, the majority measured ill-being (118 instruments), followed by instruments assessing well-being (28), and a smaller number addressing both constructs (13). In addition, 154 instruments measuring lifestyle were identified. Lifestyle behaviors were measured in a fragmented, health-risk-oriented manner, often lacking contextual influences. Individual predictors (130) were prioritized over relational and environmental factors (53). Few instruments were tailored specifically to university students, and many studies used non-validated or Discussion: Findings highlight the need for standardized, validated, and context-sensitive instruments to assess student health holistically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.