ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Predictive factors of functional movement screening and physical fitness in university students: the roles of gender, activity level, and sleep duration.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional movement and physical fitness are critical indicators of health and performance in young adults, yet their determinants among university students remain underexplored. Objective: This study examined the predictive roles of gender, age, physical activity level, sleep duration, injury history, and academic performance on functional movement screening (FMS) scores and physical fitness outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional design was employed among university students. Functional movement was assessed using the FMS, while physical fitness was measured through standardized strength, endurance, and flexibility tests. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify significant predictors. Results: Gender emerged as the strongest predictor across both domains: females achieved higher FMS scores, whereas males demonstrated superior physical fitness, particularly in strength and endurance. Physical activity level significantly predicted functional movement but not overall physical fitness, highlighting qualitative versus quantitative dimensions of performance. Age was positively associated with muscular strength, while low GPA was unexpectedly linked to higher physical fitness. Recent injury history (<6 months) negatively influenced movement efficiency, whereas sleep duration and smoking status were not significant predictors when controlling for other variables. Conclusion: Findings underscore the multidimensional nature of student health, with gender, activity level, and injury history serving as primary determinants. These results highlight the need for integrated, gender-sensitive, and injury-prevention strategies to optimize movement quality and physical fitness in university populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.