ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Developing context-specific competencies for epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the MENA region: a training needs assessment and Delphi approach.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Epidemics and pandemics continue to expose persistent preparedness gaps across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), particularly in fragile and conflict-affected settings. Strengthening workforce capacities through context-specific competencies is critical for improving preparedness and enhancing health system resilience. Methods: Guided by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) preparedness framework, the study employed a two-phase mixed-methods design comprising a Training Needs Assessment (TNA) and Delphi survey. The TNA was administered to 95 professionals from 18 MENA countries. Gaps between perceived importance and ability to perform were analyzed quantitatively alongside thematic analysis of open responses. To ensure expert validation of these competencies, the Delphi survey was conducted and included 10 regional experts involved in two iterative online rounds and a consensus meeting to refine and prioritize competencies. Results: The TNA identified significant training gaps across all five ECDC preparedness domains, with the highest needs observed in Policy Development, Adaptation, and Implementation, Detection and Assessment and Health Services. Qualitative findings revealed additional barriers, including resource shortages, weak governance, and limited access to training opportunities. The Delphi process refined these findings, allowing experts to prioritize competencies as basic, core, essential, or omitted. Of the 99 competencies, 71 were classified as essential, 23 as core, and 5 as basic. The results of the surveys directly informed the focus and content of the certificate in epidemic and pandemic preparedness. Conclusion: This study utilized the ECDC preparedness framework to assess and refine competencies for epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the MENA region. Through a TNA and Delphi approach, it produced validated, context-specific competencies that informed the design of a contextualized regional certificate. The findings underscored the critical need for targeted training programs that address both immediate and long-term challenges in health system resilience in the MENA region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.