ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Improving understanding of social prescribing by potential referrers.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social prescribing (SP) connects people with non-clinical, community resources to address social determinants of health and improve wellbeing. Many healthcare professionals lack clear understanding of SP. Objective: To assess baseline understanding of SP among healthcare students and the effect of a brief educational video on definitional accuracy and confidence. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of Medicine, Pharmacy and Nursing undergraduates, in North-East England, assessed knowledge of SP before and immediately after exposure to a brief educational video. Participants were asked if they knew what a link worker was; their confidence in explaining SP and for a brief definition. Paired non-parametric tests assessed change. Results: 49 of 76 respondents met eligibility criteria. Prior to the video 78% had heard of SP and 59% said they knew what it was but only 4 knew what a link worker was. After the video there was a significant large increase in confidence and a significant modest increase in ability to define SP. The mean definition score rose from 1.33/4 (s.d. 0.9) to 2.0 (s.d. 0.91). Two gaps in conceptual understanding persisted post-video: the referral component and the link worker role. Conclusion: Following the educational video, there were immediate improvements in confidence and modest improvements in definitional accuracy for SP. Longer term retention and application of knowledge were not assessed. Students most readily grasp "what SP connects to" (community assets, wellbeing) yet struggle with "who enacts SP and how referrals flow". We acknowledge the small sample size. Curricula should introduce SP early and explicitly teach all components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.