Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088221›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Assessment of real-world surveillance strategies for patients undergoing systemic therapy for brain metastases.

Britney Weng, Caressa Hui, Jerica Lomax, Ahmed Mohyeldin, Nataliya Mar, Warren A Chow, Misako Nagasaka, Jeremy Harris, Aaron B Simon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Britney WengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Caressa HuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Jerica LomaxDivision of Neuro-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Ahmed MohyeldinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Nataliya MarDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Warren A ChowDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Misako NagasakaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Jeremy HarrisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Aaron B SimonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Radiotherapy has long been first-line treatment for brain metastases. However, CNS penetrating systemic therapies are increasingly used as first-line alternatives. There is little evidence guiding surveillance in this setting. Here we retrospectively assessed surveillance strategies at a single institution and associated outcomes. Methods: Records from 33 patients, evaluated from 2021-2024 and treated with systemic therapy alone for active brain metastases, were reviewed. Time from diagnosis to 1st, 2nd, and 3rd surveillance MRI, incidence of intracranial progression, survival, and neurological adverse events were assessed. Patients were stratified by whether treatment was supported by the 2021 ASCO-SNO-ASTRO guidelines. Results: Treatment met guidelines for 14/33 patients. Median (range) time to 1st, 2nd, and 3rd MRI was 45 (18-207), 95 (46-204), and 180 (74-329) days, respectively. One-year cumulative incidence of local progression in the guideline group was 0.43 (95% CI [0.18-0.66]) and in the non-guideline group was 0.32 (95% CI [0.13-0.52], p=0.5). One-year cumulative incidence of brain radiation in the guideline group was 0.29 (95% CI [0.09-0.53]) and in the non-guideline group was 0.44 (95% CI [0.22-0.64], p=0.87). Two patients experienced safety events on systemic therapy (seizures). Discussion: Use of CNS-penetrating systemic therapies to treat brain metastases outpaced national guidelines in this study. While surveillance imaging frequency was variable and recurrences were common, many patients were able to delay radiation for over one year, with infrequent safety events. As interest in and options for CNS-penetrating systemic therapy grow, evidence-based guidelines for surveillance will be warranted.

Indexed as

brain metastasesCNS-penetrating systemic therapycranial brain radiationradiosurgerysurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42088221
PMCPMC13135992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.