ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
High feasibility and safety of office-based transurethral laser ablation for recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a single-center experience.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and early oncological outcomes of office-based transurethral laser ablation (TULA) for recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 53 patients undergoing their first TULA for recurrent NMIBC at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb from March 2024 to February 2025. Inclusion criteria comprised histologically confirmed NMIBC recurrence suitable for outpatient laser ablation. Exclusion criteria included carcinoma Results: The median patient age was 68 years, and 54.7% were male. Most tumors were pTa (94.3%) and low-grade (92.5%); 90.6% measured <1 cm. TULA was completed successfully in 94.3% of cases, with minimal peri-procedural complications (1.9%). At 3 months, the recurrence rate was 38.8%. Univariate analysis linked recurrence with older age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, and male gender. In multivariate analysis, male gender remained the only independent predictor (aOR 4.29; p=0.034). No patient progressed to muscle-invasive disease. Conclusions: Office-based TULA is a highly feasible, safe, and cost-effective alternative for selected patients with small recurrent low-grade NMIBC, offering significant procedural and economic advantages over transurethral resection. Although early recurrence rates are notable in this high-risk cohort, oncological safety appears acceptable. Male gender may predict early recurrence, warranting further investigation in larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.