Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088208›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Predicting dynamic changes of Ki-67 in breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy based on multi-phase DCE-MRI delta-radiomics.

Xuan Zhang, Haifeng Zhao, Hao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xuan ZhangThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Haifeng ZhaoThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Hao ZhangThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ki-67 is a key biomarker of tumor proliferation in breast cancer. A reduction in Ki-67 following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) reflects chemosensitivity and holds significant prognostic value. Therefore, pre-treatment assessment of Ki-67 dynamics during NAT is crucial for evaluating patient prognosis.This study aims to predict the change in Ki-67 index in breast cancer patients following NAT using radiomic features derived from DCE-MRI. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 148 breast cancer patients who underwent surgical resection after 6-8 cycles of NAT, randomly divided into training (n=104) and test cohorts (n=44) at a 7:3 ratio. Multivariable logistic regression (P<0.05) identified independent clinical risk factors for Ki-67 downgrading. Radiomics features were extracted from pre-treatment DCE-MRI scans from the early, peak, and delayed phases, along with the corresponding phase differences (delayed-early, delayed-peak, peak-early). Feature selection was performed with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) followed by Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and radiomics and delta-radiomics models were built using the LR-Lasso algorithm.The DeLong test compared AUC values to identify the optimal model. Top radiomics features were then combined with clinical factors to construct a hybrid model, evaluated by AUC, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the peak-to-early delta-radiomics model achieved the best diagnostic performance in the testing cohort with an AUC of 0.817(95% CI: 0.685-0.949), significantly outperforming the delayed-to-early delta model [AUC = 0.648(95% CI: 0.484-0.812)]and the standalone peak-phase model [AUC = 0.615(95% CI: 0.444-0.785)]. Logistic regression analysis revealed that HER2 status (p = 0.031) and histological grade (p<0.001) were significant predictors for constructing the clinical-radiological model. Then, integrating the optimal delta-radiomics model with independent clinical-radiological risk factors to form a combined model increased the AUC to 0.851(95% CI: 0.740-0.960), which was significantly superior to both the clinical-radiological model alone [AUC = 0.785(95% CI:0.649-0.922)]and the delta-radiomics model alone. In the external validation cohort, this model [AUC = 0.919(95% CI:0.846-0.992)] also demonstrated superior performance compared to either the standalone clinical-radiological model [AUC = 0.801(95% CI:0.680-0.924)] or the delta-radiomics model [AUC = 0.803(95% CI:0.678-0.928)]. Conclusions: Delta-radiomics based on MRI, combined with clinical parameters, represents a promising non-invasive approach for more accurately predicting Ki-67 downstaging in breast cancer following NAT, outperforming conventional radiomics models. Integrating radiomic features with clinical information holds the potential to further optimize individualized treatment strategies and improve prognostic assessment for breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

breast cancerdelta-radiomicsmulti−phase DCE-MRIneoadjuvant therapynomogram

Identifiers

PMID42088208
PMCPMC13136022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.