Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088180›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Double relief: A systematic review and meta-analysis of intravenous ketamine and morphine combination for acute trauma analgesia.

Clara Alverina, Muhammad F Kamaruddin, Herdiani S Putri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clara AlverinaFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Muhammad F KamaruddinFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Herdiani S PutriDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Acute trauma pain often remains inadequately treated despite opioid therapy. Low-dose ketamine has emerged as a promising adjunct analgesic that may enhance morphine effectiveness while reducing opioid requirements. This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of morphine combined with low-dose ketamine versus morphine alone for acute trauma analgesia. Material and Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, comprehensive searches were conducted across six databases (2006-2024) for studies comparing morphine-ketamine combination versus morphine monotherapy in acute trauma patients. Six eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ( Results: Six RCTs involving 708 patients from emergency departments and prehospital settings were analyzed. Morphine-ketamine combination demonstrated superior analgesic efficacy with significantly lower final pain scores (mean difference (MD): -0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.40 to -0.12; Conclusion: Low-dose ketamine as a morphine adjunct improves acute trauma pain control, shows a trend toward reduced opioid requirements, and maintains an acceptable safety profile, supporting its clinical implementation in emergency settings.

Indexed as

AnalgesicketamineKetamine and morphine are individually effective analgesics for trauma-related pain. This study confirms that their combination enhances pain control, shows a trend toward reduced opioid consumption, and maintains a favorable safety profile, supporting its use in emergency trauma care.morphinepaintrauma

Identifiers

PMID42088180
PMCPMC13138811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.