Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088168›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Internal jugular vein collapsibility index versus common carotid artery peak systolic velocity variation for prediction of post-spinal hypotension: A prospective observational study.

Parth Arora, Suneet Kathuria, Richa Jain, Shikha Gupta, Sumeet Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parth AroraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Suneet KathuriaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Richa JainDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Shikha GuptaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Sumeet JainDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Post-spinal anesthesia hypotension (PSAH) is associated with significant adverse outcomes, prompting extensive research into predictive markers. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the predictive value of the internal jugular vein collapsibility index (IJV-CI) and common carotid artery peak systolic velocity variation (CCA-PSV) in forecasting PSAH. Material and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 53 ASA I, II, and III adult patients undergoing elective surgery under spinal anesthesia (SAB). IJV-CI and CCA-PSV were examined using ultrasonography in all patients. SAB was administered using a standard protocol. PSAH was defined as a reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥20%. Our primary objective was to evaluate the predictive value of IJV-CI and CCA-PSV for PSAH. The secondary objective was to compare their diagnostic efficacy. Results: PSAH was found in 39.6% (21 out of 53) patients. The area under the ROC curve for IJV-CI was 0.769 (95% CI: 0.903-0.636, Conclusions: Both IJV-CI and CCA-PSV are reliable predictors of PSAH. In terms of accuracy, IJV-CI is a better predictor of hypotension post-spinal anesthesia as compared to CCA-PSV.

Indexed as

Common carotid arteryhypotensionjugular veinpredictive value of testsspinal anesthesiaultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42088168
PMCPMC13138821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.