Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088146›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2026

Comparison between invasive radial and femoral arterial pressures and carotid tonometry in ICU patients: A physiological study.

Mathieu Jozwiak, Salma Al Kahf, Emilien Umbdenstock, Jean-Louis Teboul, Denis Chemla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mathieu JozwiakService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
Salma Al KahfService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
Emilien UmbdenstockService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
Jean-Louis TeboulFaculté de Médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Denis ChemlaFaculté de Médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peripheral arterial pressure is used to guide hemodynamic management in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and for estimating various parameters of left ventricular afterload and function. Nevertheless, there is a physiological amplification of pressure from central to peripheral arteries, that remains to be documented in ICU patients. Our aim was to compare central to peripheral pressure amplification at the radial and femoral artery levels in ICU patients. Methods: In this prospective, observational and single-center study, we included consecutive spontaneously breathing patients already equipped with an arterial catheter. Carotid systolic arterial pressure obtained by carotid tonometry was considered a surrogate of aortic systolic pressure. We calculated pulse pressure amplification (PP Results: 98 patients were included: 68(69%) were men, with a mean age of 62 ± 16 years, and 42(43%) had a history of arterial hypertension. The arterial catheter was located in the radial artery in 59(60%) patients and the femoral artery in 39(40%) patients. Femoral and radial SAP and PP were higher than carotid SAP and PP (p < 0.001). The PP Conclusions: The pressure amplification was lower at the femoral than radial artery level and should not be neglected in ICU patients when interpreting arterial pressures and estimating hemodynamic variables.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular physiologyCarotid tonometryFemoral arteryIntensive care unitPulse pressure amplificationRadial arterySystolic arterial pressure

Identifiers

PMID42088146
PMCPMC13137008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.