ArticleUrology annals
True freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia: A prospective study for efficacy, safety, and tolerability in a tertiary care hospital.
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prostate cancer remains a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with a rising incidence in Asia. Transrectal biopsy, though standard, carries the risks of infection, sepsis, and readmission. Transperineal (TP) biopsy under local anesthesia (LA) offers better safety. While grid-based and device-assisted methods are well established, a true freehand technique may be a cost-effective alternative in resource-limited settings. Materials and Methods: In this prospective observational study (February 2023-January 2025), patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), abnormal digital rectal examination, or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 underwent TP biopsy using a true freehand technique under transrectal ultrasound guidance. Outcomes included pain (VAS), complications, and cancer detection rate. Statistical Analysis: SPSS 26.0 software was used for analysis. The Chi-square and Friedman tests were applied. Multivariate regression was performed to determine odds ratios (ORs). Results: One hundred and ten patients were biopsied (mean age: 66.2 ± 7.1 years; PSA 13.73 ± 7.68 ng/mL). PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions were found in 38.2%, 30.9%, and 30.9%, respectively. Most of the patients reported mild pain (VAS: ≤3), mainly during sampling. Minor complications included hematuria (25.4%), urinary retention (10%), and perineal hematoma (0.9%). No sepsis, readmissions, or Clavien-Dindo ≥ III events occurred. Clinically significant cancer was diagnosed in 61 (55.5%) patients. Gleason 4 + 5 was seen in 24 cases (39.9%). PI-RADS 4 (OR = 4.84) and 5 (OR = 6.64) were strongly associated with malignancy ( Conclusion: True freehand TP prostate biopsy under LA is safe, well-tolerated, and diagnostically effective. It is a viable alternative to device-assisted methods, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.