ArticleDementia and neurocognitive disorders2026
AI-Based Dementia Prediction From Low-Dose Brain CT in Mild Cognitive Impairments.
Article in Dementia and neurocognitive disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often limited by safety concerns and long acquisition times in elderly patients. We evaluated the potential clinical utility of an artificial intelligence (AI) model, Morph Computed Tomography (CT) Plus, to predict three-year dementia conversion in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) using rapid low-dose CT scans, prioritizing its role as a safe and efficient triage tool. Methods: We analyzed 896 MCI (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR]=0.5) patients from the Korea-Registries to Overcome Dementia and Accelerate Dementia Research cohort. A deep learning model quantified regional brain atrophy. We implemented a dual-cutoff risk-stratification strategy to optimize clinical workflow, comparing 90% and 95% sensitivity/specificity operating targets. Results: The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.870. The 90% strategy was superior for clinical triage, limiting the intermediate-risk group to 27.3% (n=99) compared to 49.6% (n=180) in the 95% strategy. For the combined high- and low-risk groups, the 90% strategy yielded an overall accuracy of 87.5%, with a positive predictive value of 83.3% and a negative predictive value of 90.4%. High-risk patients demonstrated a 14.13-fold higher hazard of conversion ( Conclusions: AI-driven CT analysis provides a high-precision, inclusive triage tool. The 90% strategy offers a scalable solution for early dementia management, especially for patients with MRI contraindications, demonstrating significant potential clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.