ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2026
Therapeutic drug monitoring of first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs: impact of dose modification on plasma drug concentrations in pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis.
Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Standard weight-based dosing of first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs does not consistently achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations in all patients. Inadequate drug exposure may contribute to poor treatment response, particularly in extrapulmonary and disseminated tuberculosis, where pharmacokinetic variability is more pronounced. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) offers a strategy to individualize dosing and optimize plasma drug concentrations. Methods: This observational analytical study enrolled 100 patients with pulmonary, extrapulmonary, or disseminated tuberculosis, of whom 84 with complete TDM data were included in the final analysis. All patients received standard weight-based doses of rifampicin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide. Plasma drug concentrations were measured after two weeks of anti-tuberculosis therapy (steady state) at 2 and 4 h following supervised drug administration. Patients with subtherapeutic concentrations underwent TDM-guided dose modification, followed by repeat plasma sampling at identical post-dose time points. Plasma drug concentrations before and after dose modification were compared, including subgroup analysis by acetylator status. Results: Among the 84 patients, 27.4% (n = 23) had pulmonary tuberculosis, 58.3% (n = 49) extrapulmonary tuberculosis, and 14.3% (n = 12) disseminated disease. At baseline, subtherapeutic 2-hour plasma concentrations were observed in 67.9% (57/84) for rifampicin and 61.9% (52/84) for isoniazid, while 11.9% (10/84) had subtherapeutic pyrazinamide levels. Following TDM-guided dose modification, median rifampicin concentrations increased from 5.9 mg/L (IQR 4.8-6.6) to 15.1 mg/L (IQR 13.7-16.8), and median isoniazid concentrations from 2.3 mg/L (IQR 1.9-2.6) to 6.2 mg/L (IQR 5.3-6.9) (p < 0.001 for both). Subtherapeutic exposure declined to 7.1% for rifampicin and 9.5% for isoniazid. Fast acetylators had significantly lower baseline isoniazid concentrations but showed marked improvement after dose escalation. Conclusion: Subtherapeutic plasma concentrations of rifampicin and isoniazid are highly prevalent in patients with pulmonary, extrapulmonary, and disseminated tuberculosis receiving standard weight-based dosing. TDM-guided dose modification results in significant and clinically meaningful improvements in drug exposure. Selective incorporation of TDM into routine tuberculosis care may facilitate precision dosing, particularly in patients with extrapulmonary disease or suspected pharmacokinetic variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.