ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2026
Quantifying the sensitivity limit of ICG imaging in the presence of tissue autofluorescence.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Fluorescent imaging (FI) using indocyanine green (ICG) is a powerful tool in medical diagnostics and surgery. Although numerous studies have focused on optimizing injection protocols and suppressing excitation light leakage, tissue autofluorescence has not been widely recognized as a fundamental factor limiting sensitivity. Aim: We aim to quantitatively determine the sensitivity limit for ICG detection in biological tissues, accounting for background signals from both scattered excitation light and tissue autofluorescence. Approach: We combine experiments on tissue phantoms with varying ICG concentrations and Monte Carlo numerical simulation of light transport in media with different optical properties. Human skin autofluorescence was quantified Results: It was established that skin autofluorescence is the dominant source of background, exceeding the scattered light by 4 to 25 times in the imaging system used. The determined ultimate sensitivity for ICG detection in biological tissue is Conclusions: Tissue autofluorescence is a fundamental factor limiting the sensitivity of ICG FI in the near-infrared range. The developed approach will allow for future optimization of imaging equipment and protocols for ICG and other contrast agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.