Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088020›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026

Evolving microbiology laboratories: mastering automated culture-based processes and molecular assays, an institutional experience.

Abdessalam Cherkaoui, Gesuele Renzi, Adrien Fischer, Mireille Tittel-Elmer, Mikaël Tognon, Patrice François, Vladimir Lazarevic, Jacques Schrenzel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abdessalam CherkaouiBacteriology Laboratory, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gesuele RenziBacteriology Laboratory, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Adrien FischerBacteriology Laboratory, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mireille Tittel-ElmerBacteriology Laboratory, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mikaël TognonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Patrice FrançoisGenomic Research Laboratory, Department of Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Vladimir LazarevicGenomic Research Laboratory, Department of Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jacques SchrenzelBacteriology Laboratory, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total laboratory automation (TLA) in microbiology integrates robotic specimen processing, automated conveyor systems, smart incubators, and high-resolution digital imaging to automate culture-based workflows from specimen setup to plate reading. Successful implementation requires careful planning, including assessment of existing laboratory infrastructure and a strategy for interfacing third-party instruments and information systems. Major barriers include capital investment, interoperability, and the need for standardized information technology interfaces. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and convolutional neural networks, have extended the value of TLA by enabling automated image interpretation, culture plate screening, and predictive analyses. These tools can reduce manual workload and turnaround time while improving standardization. In this review, drawing primarily on our institutional experience, we examine the impact of TLA and AI on diagnostic microbiology workflows, implementation strategies, and performance assessment. We also discuss automated digital microscopy, the integration of phenotypic and molecular methods, and the principal limitations that still constrain broader adoption. Finally, we highlight the need for molecular diagnostic stewardship to preserve clinical relevance and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

Automation, LaboratoryMicrobiological TechniquesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningMicroscopyWorkflowantimicrobial susceptibility testingartificial intelligencegenotypic assaygram stainingphenotypic assaysequencingtotal laboratory automation

Identifiers

PMID42088020
PMCPMC13136020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.