ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Diagnosis and investigation of infertility causes in two female giant pandas using multimodal techniques: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The advancement of artificial insemination techniques for giant pandas has significantly enhanced their breeding success. However, some pandas continue to experience difficulties in conceiving naturally, necessitating a thorough investigation into the underlying causes of infertility. This study aimed to perform pre-pregnancy examinations and diagnose infertility causes on giant pandas with infertility. Methods: A range of diagnostic methods, including behavioral observation, hormone assays, ultrasound imaging, laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, and colposcopy, were employed to conduct pre-pregnancy assessments and diagnose infertility in two giant pandas, designated as #A and #B. Results: Both pandas exhibited normal estrus behaviors, and their progesterone (P4) and estrone (E1G) levels during estrus paralleled those typically seen in successfully breeding individuals during estrus, remaining within the expected physiological range. Ultrasound evaluation of panda #A revealed a fluid accumulation surrounding the ovaries, with echogenicity noted along the walls of the adjacent fallopian tubes, suggesting the presence of hydrosalpinx, which was subsequently confirmed via laparoscopy. Hysteroscopic examination indicated that the vaginal and uterine structures of both pandas were normal. Conclusion: The estrous behaviors and hormonal profiles of the two infertile giant pandas were observed to be within normal ranges. The infertility in one of the subjects was attributed to the presence of hydrosalpinx.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.