ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Impact of inferior pulmonary ligament dissection versus preservation during thoracoscopic upper lobectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The clinical benefit of dividing the inferior pulmonary ligament (IPL) during video-assisted thoracoscopic upper lobectomy (TUL) for early-stage lung cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the association between IPL division during TUL and postoperative clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 95 patients who underwent TUL between December 2020 and June 2025. Patients were assigned to an IPL-preservation group (Group P) or an IPL-division group (Group D). Group P included 50 patients (31 right-sided and 19 left-sided procedures), and Group D included 45 (29 right-sided and 16 left-sided procedures). Postoperative outcomes-including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative air leak, chest tube duration, length of postoperative hospital stay, and changes in bronchial angle, lung volume, pulmonary function, and cough severity-were compared between groups. Bronchial angle and lung volume were measured using three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed chest computed tomography (CT) images. Cough severity and cough-related quality of life before and after surgery were assessed using the Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ-MC). Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences (all Conclusions: IPL division did not demonstrate a clear benefit over IPL preservation. The findings suggest that IPL division may be associated with reduced postoperative lung volume, impaired recovery of diffusing capacity, greater displacement of the residual bronchus, and more severe chronic cough. However, particularly for outcomes with marginally significant P values, these results should be interpreted with caution due to multiple comparisons. These conclusions are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger, prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.