ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Comparison of short-term outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for Kasai portoenterostomy in biliary atresia: a 10-year single center study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic-assisted vs. open and laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to clarify the comparative clinical efficacy and safety of open (OKPE), laparoscopic (LKPE), and robotic-assisted (RAKPE) approaches for Kasai portoenterostomy in patients with biliary atresia (BA). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 50 patients diagnosed with type III BA who underwent Kasai portoenterostomy between January 2015 and December 2024. Based on the surgical approach, patients were categorized into three groups: OKPE ( Results: RAKPE was associated with a significantly longer operative time compared to LKPE and OKPE (310 ± 39 vs. 230 ± 34 vs. 200 ± 74 min; Conclusions: OKPE, LKPE, and RAKPE demonstrate comparable short-term efficacy and safety for type III BA. While OKPE offers technical advantages in hilar dissection, minimally invasive approaches significantly optimize postoperative recovery. Surgical technique selection should be individualized based on patient characteristics, surgeon experience, and institutional resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.