ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion via bilateral channel for lumbar degenerative disease.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of bilateral channel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in the management of lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 68 patients diagnosed with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent surgical intervention at Ningbo No.6 Hospital between April 2021 and February 2022. The patients were categorized into a traditional TLIF group (38 cases) and a bilateral channel MIS-TLIF group (30 cases). Comparative assessments were performed between the two groups in terms of surgical outcomes. Results: All surgical procedures were successfully performed and postoperative follow-up was maintained for (12.7 ± 1.7 months). Statistically significant differences were observed in operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and length of hospital stay between two groups. The VAS scores and ODI of the two groups measured at 7 days postoperatively and at the final follow-up were significantly lower than the preoperative values, with statistically significant differences. The fusion rates were 89.5% in the traditional group and 93.3% in the bilateral channel MIS-TLIF group, with no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: Bilateral channel MIS-TLIF is a feasible surgical procedure and it can reduce the surgical duration and radiation exposure associated with intraoperative fluoroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.