ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2026
Effect of three post systems on the fracture resistance of teeth with extensive coronal structure loss and internal resorption.
Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different post systems on the fracture resistance of maxillary incisors with simulated internal root resorption and extensive coronal structure loss. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 100 freshly extracted maxillary incisors were randomly divided into five groups (n = 20): glass fiber post, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) post, Ribbond post, positive control, and negative control. Internal resorption cavities were prepared 6 mm above the apex in each tooth, and the canals were filled using the single-cone technique with Sure-Seal Root bioceramic sealer. PEEK posts were digitally designed based on the dimensions of the glass fiber posts and fabricated in a dental laboratory. All posts were cemented using Panavia V5 resin cement according to the manufacturer's instructions. The specimens were tested under static loading at a 45° angle using a universal testing machine until fracture occurred. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's post hoc test (
resultsThe highest mean fracture resistance was observed in the negative control group (1559.4 ± 209.1 N), while the lowest was in the positive control group (492.9 ± 73.4 N). Among the post-applied groups, the PEEK post group exhibited a significantly higher fracture resistance (907.4 ± 104 N) compared to the others (
conclusionAlthough all post systems increased the fracture resistance, none reached the strength of intact teeth. PEEK posts yielded the highest fracture resistance under the present experimental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.