ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Yield and fidelity of early steps of ribosome-free translation depend on the RNA anchoring.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Before the translational machinery came into being, a simpler form of reading RNA sequences to instruct peptide synthesis must have existed. What this earliest form of translation was is unclear. Ribosome-free synthesis, relying solely on Watson-Crick base pairing and chemical reactivity, is a likely candidate. The established version of this process involves chain growth at the C-terminus of N-terminally anchored peptides. Here, we show that ribosome- and enzyme-free translation via chain growth at the N-terminus of C-terminally anchored peptides is also feasible. Yields for the formation of dipeptides via the latter process were between 6% and 46%, though, as compared to 60%-99% for dipeptides with opposite strand growth orientation. Translation fidelity to dipeptides was also lower, with just 55%-84% correct incorporation, versus 64%-92% for N-terminally linked dipeptides. On the tripeptide level, the preference for C-terminal chain growth was smaller, suggesting that only the very first step has a strong bias for N-terminal anchoring. Finally, mixed anhydride pre-activation was found to be an alternative to in situ activation for peptidyl RNAs. This data sheds light on putative early steps in the evolution of translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.