Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42087617›Full record

ReviewPerfusion2026

Artificial intelligence-guided tools in adult ECMO: Current advancements, emerging Trends and future directions.

Benjamin Friedrichson, Andrew Stephens, Monika Tukacs, Justyna Swol, Thomas Jasny

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin FriedrichsonDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3790-281X
Andrew StephensAdvanced Cardiorespiratory Engineering Laboratory, School of Electrical Engineering and Robotics, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Monika TukacsDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Justyna SwolDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2903-092X
Thomas JasnyDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-5845-6015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides life support for patients with refractory cardiac or respiratory failure. The complexity of ECMO management and associated mortality necessitates high-accuracy clinical decision-making systems. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential approach to address challenges in ECMO management, from patient selection to real-time assessment and outcome prediction.ObjectiveTo synthesize the current evidence of AI application in adult ECMO, addressing predictive modelling for patient outcomes, real-time decision support systems, and complication prevention, as well as the evolving regulatory challenges governing medical AI deployment in critical care settings.MethodsA narrative literature review was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, IEEE Xplore, and preprint servers (arXiv/medRxiv). The search strategy combined ECMO-relevant terms ("V-A ECMO", "V-V ECMO") with AI terminologies ("artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "deep learning", "digital twin"). Studies were included if they focused on adult cohorts (age ≥18 years) and were published in English between 2018 and 2025.ResultsThe review found several AI algorithms under development for different stages of ECMO therapy. AI algorithms have been developed to assist in the initiation, prognostication, complication detection, real-time control, and weaning of ECMO. However, none have been clinically translated thus far.ConclusionWhile AI for precision ECMO management is promising, several prerequisites remain unmet, including the integration of high-frequency device data, prospective external multicenter validation, and the development of robust regulatory frameworks. Securing these advances will bridge the gap between algorithm development and the clinical arena.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAdultHumansartificial intelligenceECMOmachine learningoutcomeprediction model

Identifiers

PMID42087617
PMCPMC13149997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.