Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42087568›Full record

ArticleMedical and veterinary entomology2026

Histopathological investigation of wound healing activities of Lucilia sericata Larva and Achillea sintenisii extract combinations in diabetic rat wound model.

Nevra Polat, Salih Mollahaliloğlu, Murat Koç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical and veterinary entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nevra PolatDepartment of Traditional Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Institute of Public Health, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-2396
Salih MollahaliloğluDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7384-4106
Murat KoçDepartment of Traditional Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Institute of Public Health, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0829-4571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds, particularly in diabetic patients, represent a major clinical and economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Complementary therapies are increasingly integrated alongside conventional treatments to improve healing outcomes. Maggot debridement therapy (MDT), utilizing the larvae of Lucilia sericata, is a globally recognized method for treating non-healing wounds. These larvae secrete substances with antifungal, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. Herbal remedies also play a role in chronic wound care, with various Achillea species traditionally used for medicinal purposes. This study investigated the wound healing effects of a pomade combining L. sericata larval secretions and Achillea sintenisii plant extract, compared to Furacin®, a commercial wound healing cream. Excisional wounds were created on diabetic Wistar albino rats, which were divided into four groups: DF (Furacin®), DM (L. sericata secretion), DA (A. sintenisii extract) and DM + DA (combined). Wound area, contraction rates and histological parameters were assessed at Days 0, 4, 8 and 12. Wound area decreased significantly across all groups over time (F = 511.9, p = 0.001), with mean values declining from 11.11 cm

Indexed as

AchilleaLucilia sericataMaggot Debridement TherapyPlant ExtractsWound HealingAnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalLarvaMaleRatsRats, WistarPlant ExtractsAchillea sintenisiichronic wounddiabetes mellitusLucilia sericatamaggotwound healing

Identifiers

PMID42087568
PMCPMC13436518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.